Cutting the RSA (Active Solidarity Income) for unvaccinated employees deprived of work? That is what is currently being discussed on several television programs.
I already wrote an article last week about the fifteen departments that wrote to the Prime Minister:
Fifteen Departments, including Gironde, stated this Friday, October 29th, that they had written to the Prime Minister to request a suspension of the RSA for "persons deprived of employment following a refusal of a vaccination obligation."
RSA for the Unvaccinated: Fifteen Departments Do Not Want to Pay It
Today, the trend is accelerating, and people are starting to speak more freely on TV programs. Today, Frédéric Hermel, proudly displaying a Bible verse in his Twitter bio @fredhermel, on "Les Grandes Gueules" ("The Big Mouths"), allowed himself to say:
"Why should I pay taxes for people who do not participate in the national effort?"
I believe this gentleman should reread the Bible a bit, especially the passages where Jesus goes to the lepers, those excluded from society. He decides to exclude not lepers, but rather the unvaccinated, invoking their right to choose whether or not to inject an experimental "vaccine," as Laurent Aventin rightly points out in his letter.
So, the current solution is to deprive entire families of the minimum income to live, on the pretext that they are not vaccinated, even though they have already been deprived of their work by the Republic?
They have no national effort to make or any debt to anyone except God. You are willfully depriving them of work; this is an attack on the foundation of a Christian home and the family.
Cutting the RSA for unvaccinated and jobless employees will never be a good solution.